Skip to main content
SearchLoginLogin or Signup

Chapter 3: The Impact of Austerity on the Greek News Media and Public Sphere

The case of contemporary Greece demonstrates that despite the ongoing capitalist crisis, neoliberalism has been entrenched rather than discredited.

Published onFeb 27, 2019
Chapter 3: The Impact of Austerity on the Greek News Media and Public Sphere

The case of contemporary Greece demonstrates that despite the ongoing capitalist crisis, neoliberalism has been entrenched rather than discredited. According to Hall, Massey and Rustin, ‘the burden of “solving” the crisis has been disproportionately off-loaded on to working people, targeting vulnerable, marginalised groups’ and has served as an excuse for the ‘further restructuring of state and society along market lines, with a raft of ideologically-driven “reforms” designed to advance privatisation and marketisation’ (2015, 4–5).

The dynamic of change unleashed in the context of capitalist crises concomitantly involves significant ideological and institutional shifts in the field of politics and culture (Harvey 2014, ix). The media system is central to this very process, as media portrayals constitute how the ‘reality’ of the crisis is constructed, mapped out and contextualized. This chapter addresses such recent shifts within the Greek media system in relation to its political role, the breadth of opinions represented and the open spaces it provides to alternative views. It also discusses some examples from my research on the representation of the crisis in Greece from 2011 to 2015, which is part of a project addressing media coverage of crisis in the European Union (Nikolaidis 2015a, 2015b, 2016).

Public Communication during the Crisis: The Greek Case

The effects of the crisis on the media field may be seen as being driven by a combination of polarization and fragmentation. It is characterized by three key developments: First, the chief tendency of the mainstream, privately owned and market-driven media has been to provide ideological legitimacy to the so-called memorandum/bailout agreements, the policies of austerity stemming from them and the political elites implementing them.

Second, although mainstream Greek journalism sustained and reproduced the hegemonic neoliberal agenda (Doudaki 2015; Mylonas 2014), a simultaneous counter-tendency has emerged: the growth of a multitude of alternative news outlets, mostly online. These have been a source of critical views on the memorandum policies. Katalipsi ESIEA, the blog of the 2009 occupation of the Athenian Union of Journalists headquarters (Siapera, Papadopoulou, and Archontakis 2014), is a typically radical example highlighting, among other things, the impact of austerity in the form of redundancies and exploitative precarious labour in the Greek media industries.

Third is the closing down of the public broadcaster ERT in 2013, a development which made the clash between the mainstream and alternative online news agendas all the more stark. ERT was abruptly shut down by the previous Conservative-led government as part of its policy of cuts. The staff occupied the headquarters and continued to broadcast online with the support of EBU and Greek alternative news websites until they were evicted by riot police. ERT was succeeded by a failed attempt to establish a new broadcaster and was eventually restored by the current government.

The closing down of ERT has been rightly seen as a blow to media pluralism (Iosifidis and Boucas 2015, 19), but it is also part of a wider set of pressures on journalists, including censorship, self-censorship, prosecution and police violence (Syllas 2013). As a result, the country has the European Union’s second lowest ranking in the 2015 World Press Freedom Index, having fallen fifty-six places during the years of the crisis (Zikakou 2015).

The Political Economy of a Media Oligopoly

An analysis of public communication in such a context of crisis and change needs to take into account the ways in which major media organizations operate as privately owned and profit-orientated capitalist enterprises—not least of all because the Greek case is characterised by highly concentrated ownership across media sectors (Leandros 2010) and has often been seen as constituting a media oligopoly with connections to political elites (Iosifidis and Boucas 2015, 14). The existing concentration of media power is the outcome of major structural shifts in media ownership during the 1980s. Finance, originating mainly from the construction, shipping and oil industries, was then invested in the print media sector. Along with the remaining traditional publishers, private capital then gained control of broadcasting through the emergence of private television, which has remained practically unlicensed and unregulated (Nikolaidis 1999).

Furthermore, privately owned media organizations have accumulated severe levels of debt (Darzanou 2013). They largely operate through bank loans, into which a judicial inquiry was recently launched (Kitsios 2015), as well as through favourable treatment of their debt by pro-memorandum political elites (Papadopoulos 2013). Media debt characteristically includes more than €24 million of unpaid tax for the use of broadcasting frequencies during the 2011 to 2014 period. The overall picture is that private economic interests have achieved significant control over the public sphere in Greece under politically privileged and economically unhealthy terms. This is not to suggest that there is a deterministic, cause and effect type of relation between capitalist control of the media and journalistic content. It is, however, to suggest that the market is not neutral and that the economic aspects of media companies set the general limits of their operation. Thus, the activity of private and concentrated media ownership in a deregulated market is first and foremost a political issue, which threatens to undermine the quality of contemporary democracy (Nikolaidis 1999, 2008). This effect is characteristically demonstrated in the coverage of the economic crisis.

Mainstream Media and the Politics of Austerity

The Greek case reveals increasingly homogenised content appearing across the mainstream media, which has resulted in coherent support for the bailout agreements, the implementation of the neoliberal policies they involve and hostile coverage of opposition and critique by left-wing parties and movements. The editorials and opinion columns of the mainstream newspapers To Vima and Kathimerini, ideologically positioned in the centre and the right respectively, are exemplary of this; they both share a distinctly ideological narrative that depoliticises the crisis by neutralizing its systemic character.

The crisis is discursively constructed as a national emergency, which demands a consensus response from all the major political parties (Kathimerini 2014a; To Vima 2011a) in order to avert imminent financial and social meltdown (Karakousis 2011). Under such terms, austerity is legitimized as an objective economic necessity and/or a necessary lesser evil (Mandravelis 2011). Unsurprisingly, economic recovery is often interpreted in explicitly pro-business terms. To Vima urges workers’ unions to willingly succumb to wage losses so as to ‘facilitate’ industrialists in their activities (To Vima 2011b) and appeals to the patriotism of businessmen in the hope of turning Greece ‘into a contemporary El Dorado’ (To Vima 2012). Kathimerini celebrates both the identification of countries as brands (Kathimerini 2014b) and the equation of politics with management (Kathimerini 2014c).

The interpretation of the crisis in national terms constitutes the prevalence of consensus politics, which, at the same time, also manifests in mainstream media attacks on left-wing critics of the bailout agreements and austerity. In one characteristic example, the left is repeatedly addressed as ‘loony’ (Mandravelis 2012, 2015), in a fashion reminiscent of Thatcher-era British tabloids. The Greek case, however, is paradigmatic of a far more aggressive rhetorical strategy, the so-called ‘theory of the two extremes’, aiming to delegitimise the left by equating it with the violence of the Nazi party called Golden Dawn. In two notorious examples, this strategy was manifested in almost identical titles in different newspapers (Kasimatis 2012; Pretenteris 2012). Ironically, it was the mainstream media that contributed to the rise of the Nazi party amidst the crisis (Psarras 2012). Golden Dawn was whitewashed through high-profile interviews on private television (Horis Mantri 2015), and fake news was manufactured in its favour (Ios 2013). Just five days before the murder of the anti-fascist musician Pavlos Fyssas by Golden Dawn, which obliged authorities to begin long-overdue prosecutions of the party as a criminal organization, the party was still considered as a potential part of a conservative alliance (Papadimitriou 2013).

Alternative Media and Meta-Journalism

Such an overwhelmingly flawed performance of the media’s democratic role was also displayed during the recent referendum on further austerity measures. The mainstream media were accused of fearmongering and bias in favour of the yes vote. Subsequently, the Athenian union of journalists referred nine prominent private television journalists to its disciplinary board. In two well-known Facebook posts that went viral, content analysis of television revealed the striking imbalance of coverage of the rallies for the no and the yes votes; the coverage strongly favoured the latter (Petropoulos 2015a, 2015b).

Alternative media has offered an important counter to the mainstream. In Greece, it is a multifaceted field consisting of independent websites and magazines, crowdfunded documentaries, digital radio stations and a thriving community of bloggers and social network users. It has been enriched by the online presence of anti-austerity groups, the antifascist movement, grassroots syndicalism and left-wing organizations. As a whole, this field represents key features of citizen journalism and includes an active tradition of open publishing.

However, it also has limitations. First, the emerging relationship between alternative news and social movements on the one hand and commercial social media platforms on the other displays the effectiveness but also the contradictions that characterize cases such as Occupy (Fuchs 2014). Second, the exploitation of digital platforms by the Nazi Golden Dawn party (Kompatsiaris and Mylonas 2015) remains a politically dangerous blind spot.

The political and journalistic implications of the emergence of bottom-up pressures online may be demonstrated in the case of Twitter, a platform on which the mainstream media have been given hashtags consisting of the names of private television stations and the slang word for ‘disgraceful/ridiculous’ (#mega_xeftiles, #skai_xeftiles, etc.). In one characteristic case, the trending hashtag ‘flying anarchists’ (#iptamenoi_anarxikoi) was used to effectively ridicule and contradict the coverage of clashes between police and protestors on the private television channel Ant1. The Ant1 reporter claimed to have access to exclusive information about, among other things, an ‘airborne anarchist brigade’, and he was eventually held accountable by the online community for his adoption of the perspective of the police (Lefteria, 2014). This example demonstrates the potential of challenging official definitions and contesting the power of sources from below. At the same time, however, it also demonstrates that despite important meta-journalistic victories against the mainstream media, such media maintain their dominant reach towards large audiences, and that official power holders continue to enjoy privileged access to them.

Austerity, Consensus Politics and the Media System

The multi-layered economic, political and social changes driven by the current crisis pose continuous challenges to the political role of the media system. Current ideological and institutional shifts suggest the formation of an unprecedented elite political consensus in support of the neoliberal restructuring of Greek society. Pivotal to this development has been the shift of the SYRIZA-led government away from its anti-austerity electoral platform and its endorsement of a third memorandum agreement to more austerity measures and privatizations. Perhaps more importantly, however, the prevailing consensus has also entrenched national narratives. These frame the crisis in terms of an opposition between Greece and powerful EU member states such as Germany, at the expense of a critique of neoliberalism and class politics both in Greece and across the EU.

At the same time, the government has embarked on a broadcast license auction (Sweney 2016), the outcome of which remains uncertain at the time of writing; it nonetheless appears to aim at changing the composition of the capitalist interests controlling a now reduced number of private television stations, rather than placing barriers to concentrated media ownership in the public interest and empowering the regulation of broadcasting through an independent public authority. The extent to which alternative online media may be able to contest the impact of market-driven media organizations and rejuvenate public communication in an era of consensus politics remains to be seen. However, the implementation of austerity as a principle means of devaluing labour power and redistributing wealth towards capital depends upon the disciplining of the affected workforce and the ideological assimilation of opposition. Thus, the direct connection between the economics and the politics of the crisis suggests that law and order news remains a key media topic necessary for contesting official definitions.


Darzanou, A. 2013. “Seeking ‘Total Solutions’ to the Media’s Financial Losses and Debt [in Greek].” Avgi, December 28.

Doudaki, V. 2015. “Legitimation Mechanisms in the Bailout Discourse.” Javnost—The Public 22 (1): 1–17.

Fuchs, C. 2014. OccupyMedia! The Occupy Movement and Social Media in Crisis Capitalism. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.

Hall, S., D. Massey, and M. Rustin. 2015. “After Neoliberalism: Analysing the Present.” In After Neoliberalism? The Kilburn Manifesto, edited by S. Hall, D. Massey, and M. Rustin, 9–23. London: Lawrence and Wishart Limited.

Harvey, D. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.

Horis Mantri. 2015. “#GDtrial Golden Dawn did not arose from nowhere. It was whitewashed by small-time agents who pretend to be saviors today ... [in Greek].” Twitter, April 19.

Ios. 2013. “This Is How the News about the Old Ladies Was Manufactured.” Efimerida Ton Syntakton, September 23.

Iosifidis, P., and D. Boucas. 2015. “Media Policy and Independent Journalism in Greece.” Open Society Foundations, May 1.

Karakousis, A. 2011. “You Are to Blame if We Turn into Argentina [in Greek]!” To Vima, May 27.

Kasimatis, S. 2012. “The Golden Dawn Opportunity for Democracy [in Greek].” Kathimerini, September 16.

Kathimerini. 2014a. “Consensus [in Greek].” Kathimerini, editorial, September.

Kathimerini. 2014b. “The Good Name of Greece [in Greek].” Kathimerini, editorial, May 4.

Kathimerini. 2014c. “The Most Capable Managers [in Greek].” Kathimerini, editorial, May 11.

Kitsios, C. 2015. “Prosecutor Inquiry into Loans to the Press [in Greek]!” euro2day, April 3.

Kompatsiaris, P., and Y. Mylonas. 2015. “The Rise of Nazism and the Web: Social Media as Platforms of Racist Discourses in the Context of the Greek Economic Crisis.” In Social Media, Politics and the State: Protests, Revolutions, Riots, Crime, and Policing in the Age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, edited by C. Fuchs and D. Trottier, 109–130. New York: Routledge.

Leandros, N. 2010. “Media Concentration and Systemic Failures in Greece.” International Journal of Communication 4:886–905.

Lefteria. 2014. “The #flying Reporter Karaivaz Replies about Ant1’s Whitewashing and #iptamenoi_anarxikoi [in Greek].” Lefteria, December 9.

Mandravelis, P. 2011. “A Big Thank You [in Greek].” Kathimerini, June 30.

Mandravelis, P. 2012. “Surplus of Irrationalism [in Greek].” Kathimerini, November 24.

Mandravelis, P. 2015. “Complex-Ridden Left [in Greek].” Kathimerini, July 3.

Mylonas, Y. 2014. “Crisis, Austerity and Opposition in Mainstream Media Discourses of Greece.” Critical Discourse Studies 11 (3): 305–321.

Nikolaidis, A. 1999. “The Media under Restrictive Legislation: The Case of the Greek Press in the Early 1990s.” PhD diss., Goldsmiths College, University of London.

Nikolaidis, A. 2008. “Democracy and the Political Role of the Media: The Case of the Greek Press in the Early 1990s.” Paper presented at Anniversary Conference: Media, Communication & Humanity, London School of Economics and Political Science, September 21–23.

Nikolaidis, A. 2015a. “Immigration and the 2015 Election: The Banal, the Racist, and the Unspoken.” In UK Election Analysis 2015: Media, Voters and the Campaign, edited by D. Jackson and E. Thorsen, 98. Poole, UK: Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.

Nikolaidis, A. 2015b. “Mediating the State of Exception? Neoliberalism, Immigration and the Media amidst the Greek Crisis.” Paper presented at Reframing Media/Cultural Studies in the Age of Global Crisis, University of Westminster, June 19–20.

Nikolaidis, A. 2016. “Communities in Crisis: Mediating Austerity and the Politics of Suicide.” Paper presented at the Annual MeCCSA Conference 2016: Communities, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK, January 6–8.

Papadimitriou, B. 2013. “Annoying Confrontations [in Greek].” Kathimerini, September 13.

Papadopoulos, K. 2013. “Gift [worth] millions to [television] channel owners [in Greek].” The Press Project, January 13.

Petropoulos, M. 2015a. “A Deeper Look into MEGA News [in Greek].” Facebook status update, June 30.

Petropoulos, M. 2015b. “On Objectivity (Part 2) [in Greek].” Facebook status update, July 2.

Pretenteris, G. 2012. “Golden Opportunity [in Greek].” To Vima, September 16.

Psarras, D. 2012. The Black Book of Golden Dawn: Documents on the History and Actions of a Nazi Group [in Greek]. Athens: Polis.

Siapera, E., L. Papadopoulou, and F. Archontakis. 2014. “Post-crisis Journalism: Critique and Renewal in Greek Journalism.” Journalism Studies 16 (3): 449–465.

Sweney, M. 2016. “Greece Cuts TV Channels from Eight to Four in Controversial License Auction.” The Guardian, September 2.

Syllas, C. 2013. “Free Speech Takes a Beating.” Index on Censorship 42 (1): 16–20.

To Vima. 2011a. “Consensus Now [in Greek]!” To Vima, editorial, May 13.

To Vima. 2011b. “The ‘Pirelli’ Syndrome [in Greek].” To Vima, editorial, December 17.

To Vima. 2012. “Will Businessmen Show Up [in Greek]?” To Vima, editorial, November 10.

Zikakou, I. 2015. “Greece Ranks 91st in World Press Freedom Index.” Greek Reporter, February 19.


No comments here

Why not start the discussion?